[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130923105017.030e0aef@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:50:17 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hotplug: Optimize {get,put}_online_cpus()
On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:32:41 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> +extern void __get_online_cpus(void);
> +
> +static inline void get_online_cpus(void)
> +{
> + might_sleep();
> +
> + preempt_disable();
> + if (likely(!__cpuhp_writer || __cpuhp_writer == current))
> + this_cpu_inc(__cpuhp_refcount);
> + else
> + __get_online_cpus();
> + preempt_enable();
> +}
This isn't much different than srcu_read_lock(). What about doing
something like this:
static inline void get_online_cpus(void)
{
might_sleep();
srcu_read_lock(&cpuhp_srcu);
if (unlikely(__cpuhp_writer || __cpuhp_writer != current)) {
srcu_read_unlock(&cpuhp_srcu);
__get_online_cpus();
current->online_cpus_held++;
}
}
static inline void put_online_cpus(void)
{
if (unlikely(current->online_cpus_held)) {
current->online_cpus_held--;
__put_online_cpus();
return;
}
srcu_read_unlock(&cpuhp_srcu);
}
Then have the writer simply do:
__cpuhp_write = current;
synchronize_srcu(&cpuhp_srcu);
<grab the mutex here>
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists