[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130923160130.GC9326@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 18:01:30 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hotplug: Optimize {get,put}_online_cpus()
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 08:50:59AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Not a problem, just stuff the idx into some per-task thing. Either
> task_struct or taskinfo will work fine.
Still not seeing the point of using srcu though..
srcu_read_lock() vs synchronize_srcu() is the same but far more
expensive than preempt_disable() vs synchronize_sched().
> Or to put it another way, if the underlying slow-path mutex is
> reader-preference, then the whole thing will be reader-preference.
Right, so 1) we have no such mutex so we're going to have to open-code
that anyway, and 2) like I just explained in the other email, I want the
pending writer case to be _fast_ as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists