[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52408572.2030907@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:16:18 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
CC: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>,
Paul Walmsley <pwalmsley@...dia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] clk: tegra: add common infra for DT clocks
On 09/18/2013 08:40 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> Introduce a common infrastructure for registering DT IDs for tegra clocks and
> sharing clock initialization between SoCs. Move Tegra114 to this new
> infrastructure.
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra114.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra114.c
> +static struct tegra_clk __initdata tegra114_clks[tegra_clk_max] = {
> + [tegra_clk_rtc] = { .dt_id = TEGRA114_CLK_RTC, .present = true },
> + [tegra_clk_timer] = { .dt_id = TEGRA114_CLK_TIMER, .present = true },
It seems rather odd for a patch that adds "common infrastructure" to be
adding a Tegra114-specific table of clock IDs, especially since this new
table isn't actually used at all. I think I would expect a separate
patch for the common infra-structure and the Tegra114-specific table.
Hopefully there will be Tegra20-/30-specific tables added too in that
second patch?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists