linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] elevator: Fix a race in elevator switching and md device initialization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:14:12 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Tomoki Sekiyama <tomoki.sekiyama@....com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>,
	"vgoyal@...hat.com" <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
	"majianpeng@...il.com" <majianpeng@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] elevator: Fix a race in elevator switching and md
 device initialization

Hello,

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 08:11:55PM +0000, Tomoki Sekiyama wrote:
> >Hmm... why aren't we just changing elevator_init() to grab sysfs_lock
> >where necessary?  
> 
> The locking cannot be moved into elevator_init() because it is called
> from elevator_switch() path, where the request_queue's sysfs_lock is
> already taken.
> 
> > It'd be more consistent with elevator_exit() that way.
> 
> What elevator_exit() locks is elevator_queue's sysfs_lock, not
> request_queue's sysfs_lock. What we need here is request_queue's
> sysfs_lock.

Ah, okay.

 Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/