linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: of_get_regulation_constraints: Use node name as fallback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5240A46B.3080408@metafoo.de>
Date:	Mon, 23 Sep 2013 22:28:27 +0200
From:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: of_get_regulation_constraints: Use node name
 as fallback

On 09/23/2013 12:15 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:47:34PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> If the "regulator-name" property is not present use the name of the devicetree
>> node as a fallback.
>
> You're not supposed to use the node name for anything, the goal is that
> it's entirely ornamental noise.  Which is a bit annoying but there we
> are.
>

Is this documented somewhere? I'd be interested in the rationale behind this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/