[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5240BB2A.8060705@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:05:30 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Rhyland Klein <rklein@...dia.com>
CC: Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Manish Badarkhe <badarkhe.manish@...il.com>,
Darbha Sriharsha <dsriharsha@...dia.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch V2] drivers: power: Add support for bq24735 charger
On 09/23/2013 04:01 PM, Rhyland Klein wrote:
> On 9/23/2013 5:53 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 09/19/2013 10:18 AM, Rhyland Klein wrote:
>>> Adding driver support for bq24735 charger chipset.
>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power_supply/ti,bq24735.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power_supply/ti,bq24735.txt
>>> + - ti,charge-current : Used to control and set the charging current. This value
>>> + must follow the below guidelines:
>>> + bit 0 - 5: Not used
>>> + bit 6: 1 = Adds 64mA of charger current
>>> + bit 7: 1 = Adds 128mA of charger current
>>> + bit 8: 1 = Adds 256mA of charger current
>>> + bit 9: 1 = Adds 512mA of charger current
>>> + bit 10: 1 = Adds 1024mA of charger current
>>> + bit 11: 1 = Adds 2048mA of charger current
>>> + bit 12: 1 = Adds 4096mA of charger current
>>> + bit 13 - 15: Not used
>>
>> That's a little odd. Why not just put the number of mA directly into the
>> property unshifted?
>
> This is how the hw register is defined, its the literal number of mA.
> This is cleaned up in the upcoming revision.
OK. If you still want to use the raw register encoding, which seems
reasonable, why not just say:
ti,charge-current: Value for charge current register as described in the
HW documentation.
>>> + Setting the value to < 128mA or > 8.128A terminates charging.
>>
>> "terminates charging" is a driver action, not a description of HW. It's
>> fine to say that what min/max value should be specified in the property
>> for it to be valid, but not what action SW should take in response to that.
>
> This isn't sw. This is defined in the HW documentation as to what
> happens if an invalid value is used.
OK, if the HW documentation already says that, I don't see the need for
the DT binding to also say it; I would suggest just removing that text.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists