lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL1ERfM7Xzbi5UNqwNnMtg=aeeTABL8ad9h7XL4VVSR_iVRxTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Sep 2013 14:07:59 +0800
From:	Weijie Yang <weijie.yang.kh@...il.com>
To:	Bob Liu <bob.liu@...cle.com>
Cc:	Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@...sung.com>, minchan@...nel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] mm/zswap: avoid unnecessary page scanning

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Bob Liu <bob.liu@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> On 09/10/2013 12:29 AM, Seth Jennings wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 01:16:45PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
>>> add SetPageReclaim before __swap_writepage so that page can be moved to the
>>> tail of the inactive list, which can avoid unnecessary page scanning as this
>>> page was reclaimed by swap subsystem before.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@...sung.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>
> Below is a reply from Mel in original thread "[PATCHv11 3/4] zswap: add
> to mm/"
> ------------------
>> +     /* start writeback */
>> +     SetPageReclaim(page);
>> +     __swap_writepage(page, &wbc, end_swap_bio_write);
>> +     page_cache_release(page);
>> +     zswap_written_back_pages++;
>> +
>
> SetPageReclaim? Why?. If the page is under writeback then why do you not
> mark it as that? Do not free pages that are currently under writeback
> obviously. It's likely that it was PageWriteback you wanted in zbud.c too.
> --------------------

Thanks for reminding this.

The purpose of using this flag in PATCHv11 and this patch is different.

In PATCHv11, it was repurposed to protect zbud page against free,
and now it is replaced with zhdr->under_reclaim.

In this patch, this flag is for its original purpose(to be reclaimed asap)

> --
> Regards,
> -Bob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ