[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1379898516.5476.27.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 03:08:36 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
Cc: Jia He <jiakernel@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipc/sem.c: fix update sem_otime when calling sem_op in
semaphore initialization
On Sun, 2013-09-22 at 12:42 +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> Mike: no, your patch makes it worse:
> - wait-for-zero semops still don't update sem_otime
> - sem_otime is initialized to sem_ctime. That's not mentioned in the
> sysv standard.
So sem_otime = 0 is a specified semaphore state? I thought the proggy
was busted for spinning on a (busted and) irrelevant stamp.
Man lernt nie aus.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists