[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <523FEE23.3010503@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:30:43 +0300
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
CC: <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de>,
<linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap_dss2 tree with the fbdev
tree
Hi Stephen, Jean-Christophe,
On 23/09/13 05:28, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Tomi,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the omap_dss2 tree got a conflict in
> drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c between commits a17c2e7b704f ("video:
> atmel_lcdfb: fix platform data struct") and 5e8be022fb5b ("video:
> atmel_lcdfb: add device tree suport") from the fbdev tree and commit
> a5d58be0796a ("video: atmel_lcdfb: use dev_get_platdata()") from the
> omap_dss2 tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).
Jean-Christophe's tree seems to contain some old commits, never pushed
to mainline. Jean-Christophe, can you reset your for-next branch?
Tomi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (902 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists