linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] gpio/omap: auto-setup a GPIO when used as an IRQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <524141A6.2090701@ti.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:09:18 +0530
From:	Sricharan R <r.sricharan@...com>
To:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Lars Poeschel <larsi@....tu-dresden.de>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetbo@...il.com>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Balaji T K <balajitk@...com>,
	Jon Hunter <jgchunter@...il.com>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] gpio/omap: auto-setup a GPIO when used as an IRQ

Hi,
On Monday 23 September 2013 10:37 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk> [130923 10:09]:
>> On 09/23/2013 06:45 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> Hmm does this still work for legacy platform data based
>>> drivers that are doing gpio_request() first?
>>>
>> Yes it still work when booting using board files. I tested on my OMAP3 board and
>> it worked in both DT and legacy booting mode.
> OK great.
>  
>>> And what's the path for clearing things for PM when free_irq()
>>> gets called? It seems that this would leave the GPIO bank
>>> enabled causing a PM regression?
>>>
>> Indeed, I did set bank->mod_usage |= 1 << offset so the bank is enabled if the
>> device goes to suspended and then resumed but I completely forget about the
>> clearing path when the IRQ is freed.
>>
>> Which makes me think that we should probably maintain two usage variables, one
>> for GPIO and another one for IRQ and check both of them on the suspend/resume pm
>> functions.
> Yes that it seems that they should be treated separately.
 To understand, why cant the flag be cleared in gpio_irq_shutdown ?

Regards,
 Sricharan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/