linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/11] sched, rcu: Make RCU use resched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:07:06 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] sched, rcu: Make RCU use resched_cpu()

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 02:18:27PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Passes light testing, but I am confused about why the change to
> resched_task() when only resched_cpu() is invoked elsewhere in the patch.
> Enlightenment?
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > >  void resched_task(struct task_struct *p)
> > >  {
> > >  	int cpu;
> > > 
> > > -	assert_raw_spin_locked(&task_rq(p)->lock);
> > > +	lockdep_assert_held(&task_rq(p)->lock);
> > > 
> > >  	if (test_tsk_need_resched(p))
> > >  		return;

That one? Fly by fixup I suppose.. the lockdep check is cheaper as it
compiles away for !lockdep kernels, also its more correct.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/