linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Use per-file CFLAGS in Makefile

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 Sep 2013 17:09:21 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Use per-file CFLAGS in Makefile

Hi Boris,

On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:26:59 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 06:15:09PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> I replaced them to a single -w option since all we want to do is
>> suppress any warning, right?
>
> Do we? And besides, -w is a big hammer as it shuts up all warnings.
> acme?
>
> I think special handling those files grew out of necessity to shut up
> some warnings but acme would know better.

I don't know.  I just thought there's not much thing we can do for those
files other than shutting up all warnings.

But if you think that's not the right thing, I'll keep the existing
options.  What do you think, Arnaldo?

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/