[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <52415ED9.3030407@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:43:53 +0200
From: Tomasz Stanislawski <t.stanislaws@...sung.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Cc: Mateusz Krawczuk <m.krawczuk@...tner.samsung.com>,
m.chehab@...sung.com, t.figa@...sung.com,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com, s.nawrocki@...sung.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] media: s5p-tv: Replace mxr_ macro by default dev_
Hi,
On 09/23/2013 05:48 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> On Monday, September 23, 2013 04:50:01 PM Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
>> Hello,
>> May I ask what is the rationale for this patch?
>> To reduce a few lines of code?
>
> This patch makes source code more generic-like and easier to follow (mxd_r*
more generic(-like?) - NOT. Using mxr_ macros is a more generic way to produce logs
because one can change only one line to change error format for the whole module.
For example, in case of mxr_ family, a patch adding function name to debug message
would require just a few lines patch. Using in case of dev_ family, one has to
produce 200-lines of highly conflicting patch.
'easier to follow' - MAYBE. I agree that some people may prefer to
see more directly what is happening, but tell me if you really consider line:
mxr_dbg(mdev, "this is debug\n");
as a very confusing and obfuscated piece of code.
COME ON!
Regards,
TS
> macros currently only obfuscate the code and make them harder to read for
> everybody, maybe besides the original driver author ;). Removal of few
> superfluous lines of code is just a bonus.
>
>> Or to give up possibility of changing message format in just one place?
>
> For over two and half year (since s5p-tv driver introduction in Feb 2011)
> such change was not needed and it doesn't seem that keeping the code to
> allow such possibility is worth an added code obfuscation.
>
> Besides you can easily script a change to message format so in practice
> I don't see a real advantage of keeping non-standard messaging macros
> just for easing a potential message format conversion.
>
>> I could see migrating from mxr_* to pr_* could seen as the fix, but not this.
>
> Such migration seems to be pointless as you would have to add an extra
> argument to pr_* to not lose the device information.
There is something called pr_fmt. It may help with mentioned issue.
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> Samsung Electronics
>
>> Waiting for reply,
>> Tomasz Stanislawski
>>
>>
>> On 09/21/2013 05:00 PM, Mateusz Krawczuk wrote:
>>> Replace mxr_dbg, mxr_info and mxr_warn by generic solution.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Krawczuk <m.krawczuk@...tner.samsung.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/media/platform/s5p-tv/mixer.h | 12 ---
>>> drivers/media/platform/s5p-tv/mixer_drv.c | 47 ++++++-----
>>> drivers/media/platform/s5p-tv/mixer_grp_layer.c | 2 +-
>>> drivers/media/platform/s5p-tv/mixer_reg.c | 6 +-
>>> drivers/media/platform/s5p-tv/mixer_video.c | 100 ++++++++++++------------
>>> drivers/media/platform/s5p-tv/mixer_vp_layer.c | 2 +-
>>> 6 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)
>>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists