| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130924142935.GA5697@infradead.org> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 07:29:35 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>, axboe@...nel.dk, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 09:20:14AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > Have you been over the patchset? Looks sane to you? I looked over it, although I didn't dig into the details of all driver patches, and I like what I see. As said in the previous mail I'd love to see the patches to shrink struct bio again, too. > Given how disruptive this patchset is to the block layer I'm wondering > how painful this change will be in combination with Jens' blk-mq > changes. I'd prefer to see blk-mq before immutable biovecs; but I have > my own selfish reasons for that. I don't see too much conflicts with blk-multiqueue as that is operating at the request layer. Blk-multiqueue defintively is a higher priority for me, but as it already looks fairly good I have no idea what we're blocked on for it anyway. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists