[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130924210221.GF26785@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 23:02:21 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hotplug: Optimize {get,put}_online_cpus()
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:24:23PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> +void __get_online_cpus(void)
> +{
> + if (__cpuhp_writer == 1) {
take_ref:
> + /* See __srcu_read_lock() */
> + __this_cpu_inc(__cpuhp_refcount);
> + smp_mb();
> + __this_cpu_inc(cpuhp_seq);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + atomic_inc(&cpuhp_waitcount);
> +
> /*
> + * We either call schedule() in the wait, or we'll fall through
> + * and reschedule on the preempt_enable() in get_online_cpus().
> */
> + preempt_enable_no_resched();
> + wait_event(cpuhp_readers, !__cpuhp_writer);
> + preempt_disable();
>
> + /*
> + * XXX list_empty_careful(&cpuhp_readers.task_list) ?
> + */
> + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&cpuhp_waitcount))
> + wake_up_all(&cpuhp_writer);
goto take_ref;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__get_online_cpus);
It would probably be a good idea to increment __cpuhp_refcount after the
wait_event.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists