lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL1qeaEpu=YRasZpSvrCTNwC6OGWZgECjwDSFgkAN07eWObmrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Sep 2013 15:12:27 -0700
From:	Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>
To:	Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@...sung.com>,
	Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna@...sung.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@...aro.org>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	Padmavathi Venna <padma.v@...sung.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/6] clk: exynos-audss: convert to platform device

>> +static int exynos_audss_clk_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> +       int i;
>> +
>> +       of_clk_del_provider(pdev->dev.of_node);
>> +
>> +       for (i = 0; i<  EXYNOS_AUDSS_MAX_CLKS; i++) {
>> +               if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clk_table[i]))
>> +                       clk_unregister(clk_table[i]);
>> +       }
>
>
> Since we only get here if all the clocks are registered properly and we
> always register EXYNOS_AUDSS_MAX_CLKS clocks, couldn't this simply be:
>
>
>         for (i = 0; i < EXYNOS_AUDSS_MAX_CLKS; i++)
>                 clk_unregister(clk_table[i]);
>
> ?

Once support is added for Exynos5420, we won't always register
EXYNOS_AUDSS_MAX_CLKS clocks, so we'd still need the NULL check.

Thanks,
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ