[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130925164057.6bbaf23bdc5057c42b2ab010@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:40:57 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: mgorman@...e.de, dave@...1.net, hannes@...xchg.org,
tony.luck@...el.com, matthew.garrett@...ula.com, riel@...hat.com,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com,
willy@...ux.intel.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
lenb@...nel.org, rjw@...k.pl, gargankita@...il.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
andi@...stfloor.org, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com,
santosh.shilimkar@...com, kosaki.motohiro@...il.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Results] [RFC PATCH v4 00/40] mm: Memory Power Management
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 04:56:32 +0530 "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Experimental Results:
> ====================
>
> Test setup:
> ----------
>
> x86 Sandybridge dual-socket quad core HT-enabled machine, with 128GB RAM.
> Memory Region size = 512MB.
Yes, but how much power was saved ;)
Also, the changelogs don't appear to discuss one obvious downside: the
latency incurred in bringing a bank out of one of the low-power states
and back into full operation. Please do discuss and quantify that to
the best of your knowledge.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists