| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 17:17:54 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Subject: [ 008/117] zram: dont grab mutex in zram_slot_free_noity
3.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
commit a0c516cbfc7452c8cbd564525fef66d9f20b46d1 upstream.
[1] introduced down_write in zram_slot_free_notify to prevent race
between zram_slot_free_notify and zram_bvec_[read|write]. The race
could happen if somebody who has right permission to open swap device
is reading swap device while it is used by swap in parallel.
However, zram_slot_free_notify is called with holding spin_lock of
swap layer so we shouldn't avoid holing mutex. Otherwise, lockdep
warns it.
This patch adds new list to handle free slot and workqueue
so zram_slot_free_notify just registers slot index to be freed and
registers the request to workqueue. If workqueue is expired,
it holds mutex_lock so there is no problem any more.
If any I/O is issued, zram handles pending slot-free request
caused by zram_slot_free_notify right before handling issued
request because workqueue wouldn't be expired yet so zram I/O
request handling function can miss it.
Lastly, when zram is reset, flush_work could handle all of pending
free request so we shouldn't have memory leak.
NOTE: If zram_slot_free_notify's kmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC would be
failed, the slot will be freed when next write I/O write the slot.
[1] [57ab0485, zram: use zram->lock to protect zram_free_page()
in swap free notify path]
* from v2
* refactoring
* from v1
* totally redesign
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.h | 10 ++++++
2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -445,6 +445,14 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *
goto out;
}
+ /*
+ * zram_slot_free_notify could miss free so that let's
+ * double check.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(meta->table[index].handle ||
+ zram_test_flag(meta, index, ZRAM_ZERO)))
+ zram_free_page(zram, index);
+
ret = lzo1x_1_compress(uncmem, PAGE_SIZE, src, &clen,
meta->compress_workmem);
@@ -504,6 +512,20 @@ out:
return ret;
}
+static void handle_pending_slot_free(struct zram *zram)
+{
+ struct zram_slot_free *free_rq;
+
+ spin_lock(&zram->slot_free_lock);
+ while (zram->slot_free_rq) {
+ free_rq = zram->slot_free_rq;
+ zram->slot_free_rq = free_rq->next;
+ zram_free_page(zram, free_rq->index);
+ kfree(free_rq);
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&zram->slot_free_lock);
+}
+
static int zram_bvec_rw(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
int offset, struct bio *bio, int rw)
{
@@ -511,10 +533,12 @@ static int zram_bvec_rw(struct zram *zra
if (rw == READ) {
down_read(&zram->lock);
+ handle_pending_slot_free(zram);
ret = zram_bvec_read(zram, bvec, index, offset, bio);
up_read(&zram->lock);
} else {
down_write(&zram->lock);
+ handle_pending_slot_free(zram);
ret = zram_bvec_write(zram, bvec, index, offset);
up_write(&zram->lock);
}
@@ -527,6 +551,8 @@ static void zram_reset_device(struct zra
size_t index;
struct zram_meta *meta;
+ flush_work(&zram->free_work);
+
down_write(&zram->init_lock);
if (!zram->init_done) {
up_write(&zram->init_lock);
@@ -721,16 +747,40 @@ error:
bio_io_error(bio);
}
+static void zram_slot_free(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct zram *zram;
+
+ zram = container_of(work, struct zram, free_work);
+ down_write(&zram->lock);
+ handle_pending_slot_free(zram);
+ up_write(&zram->lock);
+}
+
+static void add_slot_free(struct zram *zram, struct zram_slot_free *free_rq)
+{
+ spin_lock(&zram->slot_free_lock);
+ free_rq->next = zram->slot_free_rq;
+ zram->slot_free_rq = free_rq;
+ spin_unlock(&zram->slot_free_lock);
+}
+
static void zram_slot_free_notify(struct block_device *bdev,
unsigned long index)
{
struct zram *zram;
+ struct zram_slot_free *free_rq;
zram = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
- down_write(&zram->lock);
- zram_free_page(zram, index);
- up_write(&zram->lock);
atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.notify_free);
+
+ free_rq = kmalloc(sizeof(struct zram_slot_free), GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (!free_rq)
+ return;
+
+ free_rq->index = index;
+ add_slot_free(zram, free_rq);
+ schedule_work(&zram->free_work);
}
static const struct block_device_operations zram_devops = {
@@ -777,6 +827,10 @@ static int create_device(struct zram *zr
init_rwsem(&zram->lock);
init_rwsem(&zram->init_lock);
+ INIT_WORK(&zram->free_work, zram_slot_free);
+ spin_lock_init(&zram->slot_free_lock);
+ zram->slot_free_rq = NULL;
+
zram->queue = blk_alloc_queue(GFP_KERNEL);
if (!zram->queue) {
pr_err("Error allocating disk queue for device %d\n",
--- a/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.h
@@ -94,11 +94,20 @@ struct zram_meta {
struct zs_pool *mem_pool;
};
+struct zram_slot_free {
+ unsigned long index;
+ struct zram_slot_free *next;
+};
+
struct zram {
struct zram_meta *meta;
struct rw_semaphore lock; /* protect compression buffers, table,
* 32bit stat counters against concurrent
* notifications, reads and writes */
+
+ struct work_struct free_work; /* handle pending free request */
+ struct zram_slot_free *slot_free_rq; /* list head of free request */
+
struct request_queue *queue;
struct gendisk *disk;
int init_done;
@@ -109,6 +118,7 @@ struct zram {
* we can store in a disk.
*/
u64 disksize; /* bytes */
+ spinlock_t slot_free_lock;
struct zram_stats stats;
};
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists