linux-kernel - [ 095/110] isofs: Refuse RW mount of the filesystem instead of making it RO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130925001333.705012318@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 24 Sep 2013 17:15:33 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Hui Wang <hui.wang@...onical.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [ 095/110] isofs: Refuse RW mount of the filesystem instead of making it RO

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

commit 17b7f7cf58926844e1dd40f5eb5348d481deca6a upstream.

Refuse RW mount of isofs filesystem. So far we just silently changed it
to RO mount but when the media is writeable, block layer won't notice
this change and thus will think device is used RW and will block eject
button of the drive. That is unexpected by users because for
non-writeable media eject button works just fine.

Userspace mount(8) command handles this just fine and retries mounting
with MS_RDONLY set so userspace shouldn't see any regression.  Plus any
tool mounting isofs is likely confronted with the case of read-only
media where block layer already refuses to mount the filesystem without
MS_RDONLY set so our behavior shouldn't be anything new for it.

Reported-by: Hui Wang <hui.wang@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/isofs/inode.c |   16 +++++-----------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/isofs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/isofs/inode.c
@@ -125,8 +125,8 @@ static void destroy_inodecache(void)
 
 static int isofs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
 {
-	/* we probably want a lot more here */
-	*flags |= MS_RDONLY;
+	if (!(*flags & MS_RDONLY))
+		return -EROFS;
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -779,15 +779,6 @@ root_found:
 	 */
 	s->s_maxbytes = 0x80000000000LL;
 
-	/*
-	 * The CDROM is read-only, has no nodes (devices) on it, and since
-	 * all of the files appear to be owned by root, we really do not want
-	 * to allow suid.  (suid or devices will not show up unless we have
-	 * Rock Ridge extensions)
-	 */
-
-	s->s_flags |= MS_RDONLY /* | MS_NODEV | MS_NOSUID */;
-
 	/* Set this for reference. Its not currently used except on write
 	   which we don't have .. */
 
@@ -1546,6 +1537,9 @@ struct inode *isofs_iget(struct super_bl
 static struct dentry *isofs_mount(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
 	int flags, const char *dev_name, void *data)
 {
+	/* We don't support read-write mounts */
+	if (!(flags & MS_RDONLY))
+		return ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
 	return mount_bdev(fs_type, flags, dev_name, data, isofs_fill_super);
 }
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/