[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1380072916-31557-2-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:35:05 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
sbw@....edu, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/13] notifiers: Apply rcu_access_pointer() to avoid sparse false positive
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
The sparse checking for rcu_assign_pointer() was recently upgraded
to reject non-__kernel address spaces. This also rejects __rcu,
which is almost always the right thing to do. However, the use in
notifier_chain_unregister() is legitimate: It is deleting an element
from an RCU-protected list, and all elements of this list are already
visible to caller.
This commit therefore silences this false positive by laundering the
pointer using rcu_access_pointer() as suggested by Josh Triplett.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/notifier.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/notifier.c b/kernel/notifier.c
index 2d5cc4c..1857c71 100644
--- a/kernel/notifier.c
+++ b/kernel/notifier.c
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static int notifier_chain_unregister(struct notifier_block **nl,
{
while ((*nl) != NULL) {
if ((*nl) == n) {
- rcu_assign_pointer(*nl, n->next);
+ rcu_assign_pointer(*nl, rcu_access_pointer(n->next));
return 0;
}
nl = &((*nl)->next);
--
1.8.1.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists