[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1380072916-31557-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:35:04 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
sbw@....edu, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/13] rcu: Make rcu_assign_pointer's assignment volatile and type-safe
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
rcu_assign_pointer needs to use ACCESS_ONCE to make the assignment to
the destination pointer volatile, to protect against compilers too
clever for their own good.
In addition, since rcu_assign_pointer force-casts the source pointer to
add the __rcu address space (overriding any existing address space), add
an explicit check that the source pointer has the __kernel address space
to start with.
This new check produces warnings like this, when attempting to assign
from a __user pointer:
test.c:25:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
test.c:25:9: expected struct foo *<noident>
test.c:25:9: got struct foo [noderef] <asn:1>*badsrc
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index f1f1bc3..5b444e0 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -506,8 +506,17 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void)
#ifdef __CHECKER__
#define rcu_dereference_sparse(p, space) \
((void)(((typeof(*p) space *)p) == p))
+/* The dummy first argument in __rcu_assign_pointer_typecheck makes the
+ * typechecked pointer the second argument, matching rcu_assign_pointer itself;
+ * this avoids confusion about argument numbers in warning messages. */
+#define __rcu_assign_pointer_check_kernel(v) \
+ do { \
+ extern void __rcu_assign_pointer_typecheck(int, typeof(*(v)) __kernel *); \
+ __rcu_assign_pointer_typecheck(0, v); \
+ } while (0)
#else /* #ifdef __CHECKER__ */
#define rcu_dereference_sparse(p, space)
+#define __rcu_assign_pointer_check_kernel(v) do { } while (0)
#endif /* #else #ifdef __CHECKER__ */
#define __rcu_access_pointer(p, space) \
@@ -551,7 +560,8 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void)
#define __rcu_assign_pointer(p, v, space) \
do { \
smp_wmb(); \
- (p) = (typeof(*v) __force space *)(v); \
+ __rcu_assign_pointer_check_kernel(v); \
+ ACCESS_ONCE(p) = (typeof(*(v)) __force space *)(v); \
} while (0)
--
1.8.1.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists