linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] oom: avoid killing init if it assume the oom killed thread's mm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 Sep 2013 19:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Ming Liu <ming.liu@...driver.com>
cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...e.cz, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	hannes@...xchg.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom: avoid killing init if it assume the oom killed
 thread's mm

On Mon, 23 Sep 2013, Ming Liu wrote:

> After selecting a task to kill, the oom killer iterates all processes and
> kills all other user threads that share the same mm_struct in different
> thread groups.
> 
> But in some extreme cases, the selected task happens to be a vfork child
> of init process sharing the same mm_struct with it, which causes kernel
> panic on init getting killed. This panic is observed in a busybox shell
> that busybox itself is init, with a kthread keeps consuming memories.
> 

We shouldn't be selecting a process where mm == init_mm in the first 
place, so this wouldn't fix the issue entirely.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/