[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130924211047.57f9d9c8.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 21:10:47 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/11] mm: Place preemption point in
do_mlockall() loop
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:29:11 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> --- a/mm/mlock.c
> +++ b/mm/mlock.c
> @@ -736,6 +736,7 @@ static int do_mlockall(int flags)
>
> /* Ignore errors */
> mlock_fixup(vma, &prev, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end, newflags);
> + cond_resched();
> }
> out:
> return 0;
Might need one in munlock_vma_pages_range() as well - it's a matter of
finding the right test case. This will be neverending :(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists