linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 20/20] regulator: vexpress: use devm_regulator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1380106593.7211.5.camel@hornet>
Date:	Wed, 25 Sep 2013 11:56:33 +0100
From:	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>
To:	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
Cc:	'Mark Brown' <broonie@...nel.org>,
	'Liam Girdwood' <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/20] regulator: vexpress: use devm_regulator_register()

On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 09:17 +0100, Jingoo Han wrote:
> Use devm_regulator_register() to make cleanup paths simpler.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/vexpress.c |    3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/vexpress.c b/drivers/regulator/vexpress.c
> index 4668c7f..f3ae28a 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/vexpress.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/vexpress.c
> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static int vexpress_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	config.driver_data = reg;
>  	config.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>  
> -	reg->regdev = regulator_register(&reg->desc, &config);
> +	reg->regdev = devm_regulator_register(&pdev->dev, &reg->desc, &config);
>  	if (IS_ERR(reg->regdev)) {
>  		err = PTR_ERR(reg->regdev);
>  		goto error_regulator_register;
> @@ -119,7 +119,6 @@ static int vexpress_regulator_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct vexpress_regulator *reg = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  
>  	vexpress_config_func_put(reg->func);
> -	regulator_unregister(reg->regdev);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }

I'm assuming it's following a patch adding devm_regulator_register()?

Based on this:

Acked-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>

Thanks!

Pawel


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/