linux-kernel - Re: increased vmap_area_lock contentions on "n_tty: Move buffers into n_tty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 25 Sep 2013 07:30:40 -0400
From:	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To:	Lin Ming <minggr@...il.com>
CC:	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: increased vmap_area_lock contentions on "n_tty: Move buffers
 into n_tty_data"

On 09/25/2013 05:04 AM, Lin Ming wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com> wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> Looking over vmalloc.c, the critical section footprint of the vmap_area_lock
>> could definitely be reduced (even nearly eliminated), but that's a project
>> for
>> another day :)
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> I also looked over vmallo.c, but didn't find obvious way to reduce the
> critical section footprint.
> Could you share some hints how to do this?

vmap_area_list is an RCU list.
get_vmalloc_info() doesn't need to take the vmap_area_lock at all.
Look at __purge_vmap_area_lazy() for a howto.

Regards,
Peter Hurley

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/