[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <3930265.gHe05HETI5@amdc1032>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:49:56 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
Cc: balbi@...com, bcousson@...libre.com, tony@...mide.com,
balajitk@...com, kishon@...com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/15] ata: ti_sata: Add Texas Instruments SATA Wrapper
driver
On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 02:37:19 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
[...]
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > +
> > +static int ti_sata_resume(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> > + pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
> > + pm_runtime_enable(dev);
>
> This doesn't look like a correct ->resume method:
> * it shouldn't touch runtime PM at all
> * for each ->resume method there should be a corresponding ->suspend method
>
> Moreover this whole wrapper driver seems strange, why not just add a proper
> runtime PM support to ahci_platform driver instead?
Hmm, even this shouldn't be needed as this wrapper driver doesn't have
->runtime_suspend and ->runtime resume methods.
What exactly is the purpose of the existence of this wrapper driver?
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists