| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:52:44 +0100 From: Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com> To: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>, Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Trivial patch monkey <trivial@...nel.org>, Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, "linux-omap\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, "linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org> Subject: Re: new binutils needed for arm in 3.12-rc1 Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net> writes: > On 09/24/2013 09:07:57 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> I'd strongly suggest you make your binutils compatible with newer >> instruction syntax instead of making the kernel more complex. > > Meaning I play whack-a-mole as this becomes permission to depend on > endless new gnuisms just because they're there and nobody else is > regression testing against them, not because they actually add anything. Since when is assembling the instructions correctly, as specified in the arch ref, and not in some other random way a gnuism? -- Måns Rullgård mans@...sr.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists