[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0000014155fdd6cf-d54da8b8-2198-40ce-8831-4559971e69f0-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:40:07 +0000
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, akpm@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [pchecks v2 2/2] percpu: Add preemption checks to __this_cpu
ops
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Ok, this variant looks pretty good, modulo testing. I'd do:
>
> s/check_preemption/check_preemption_disabled
>
> but that's a minor detail.
Sure.
> > +config DEBUG_THIS_CPU_OPERATIONS
> > + bool "Debug __this_cpu operations"
> > + depends on DEBUG_PREEMPT
> > + default n
> > + help
> > + Enables preemption checks for __this_cpu macros. These
> > + are macros to generate single instruction operations on
> > + per cpu data. The option only affects the __this_cpu variant
> > + which is used when fallback to multiple instructions without
> > + other synchronization is possible. A verification is then
> > + done to make sure that the thread cannot be preempted.
>
> I don't think there's a need to make this a separate preemption debug
> option: smp_processor_id() is really just a subset of the checks.
I think this is necessary since it seems that the discussions on how to do
the raw_cpu conversions may take some time. If we enable it by default
then there will be numerous new log messages. That way a developer can
enable it for working on this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists