[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130925195012.GI2954@lukather>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 22:50:12 +0300
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, kevin.z.m.zh@...il.com,
sunny@...winnertech.com, shuge@...winnertech.com,
Emilio Lopez <emilio@...pez.com.ar>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Allwinner SoCs High Speed Timer support
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:14:46AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> >> However, the A20 and A31 come with 4 of these high speed timers, while the A10s
> >> and A13 only have two, hence why we introduce two different compatibles.
> >
> > ...but the A10 has 2?
> >
> > -ECONFUSED
>
> A10s != A10. Yes, confusing. :)
Yeah, I didn't get to chose the names :)
For all we know, so far, allwinner has released, by family:
- sun3i (ARM926)
* F20 (not supported)
- sun4i (Cortex A8)
* A10
- sun5i (Cortex A8)
* A10s
* A13
- sun6i (4 * Cortex A7)
* A31
* A31s (not supported)
- sun7i (2 * Cortex A7)
* A20
* A23? (that was just announced)
So yes, even though they are quite close, A10 != A10s :)
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists