lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130925220900.GA26965@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:09:00 +0200
From:	Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] msi: add forgotten pci_dev_put(pdev) to
 populate_msi_sysfs()

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 03:30:14PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> wrote:
>> Also, I think it is incorrect that free_msi_irqs() does this:
>>
>>                 if (entry->kobj.parent) {
>>                         kobject_del(&entry->kobj);
>>                         kobject_put(&entry->kobj);
>>                 }
>>
>>                 list_del(&entry->list);
>>                 kfree(entry);
>>
>> I think the "kfree(entry)" should be in msi_kobj_release() instead.
>
>Oh, I see you fixed this in patch 3/3.  I hadn't read that far yet :)
>
>Did you find these problems by inspection, or is there some easy way
>to trigger bad behavior?  Just wondering if this is some way I can
>reproduce the problem.

Hi,

I've first found it by building with CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE and
CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS - it shows that it's freeing an object in an active
state (I'm just running insmod/rmmod tg3 concurently, but I guess it's
reproducible with any driver that uses msi/x).

Without CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS it's also reproducible, and without
CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE it's really hard to reproduce, but still
reproducible (I've hit it with tg3 as a slave of bonding and concurently
running rmmod bonding/ifup bond0 - though it's really hard). It just panics
in kobject_put(), iirc.

So, with those CONFIG_DEBUG_* it's easily triggerable, without - quite
hard.

Hope that helps.

p.s. I'll adress your other comments tomorrow already, it's quite late here
and I don't want to do something stupid now :).

Thanks a lot!

>
>Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ