[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52435FE2.20805@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:12:50 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, rjw@...k.pl
CC: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/21] cpuidle: avoid unnecessary kzalloc/free of struct
cpuidle_device_kobj
On 09/22/2013 03:21 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> We always need to allocate struct cpuidle_device_kobj for all CPUs and so there
> is no real need to have a pointer to it inside struct cpuidle_device.
>
> This patch makes a object instance of struct cpuidle_device_kobj inside struct
> cpuidle_device instead of a pointer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
nack, it was made in purpose for kobject_init_and_add.
see commit 728ce22b696f9f1404a74d7b2279a65933553a1b
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists