lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <02f401ceba7b$6dc16e20$49444a60$%kim@samsung.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:44:12 +0900
From:	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
To:	'Mateusz Krawczuk' <m.krawczuk@...tner.samsung.com>
Cc:	linux@....linux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	b.zolnierkie@...sung.com, t.figa@...sung.com,
	m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
	'Kyungmin Park' <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC] clk: samsung:  Remove old clock drivers for s5pc100 and
 s5pv210

Mateusz Krawczuk wrote:
> 
> This patch removes old clock management code for S5PC100 and
> S5PC110/S5PV210,
> since the platform has been already moved to the new clock driver
> using Common Clock Framework.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Krawczuk <m.krawczuk@...tner.samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
> ---
> This patch series require
> S5PC100 and S5PV210 patch series moving to common clock framework.
> 
>  arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/Kconfig  |    2 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/Makefile |    1 -
>  arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c  | 1361 -----------------------------------
> ----
>  arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig  |    2 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile |    1 -
>  arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c  | 1365 -----------------------------------
> -----
>  6 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2730 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c
>  delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c
> 
In this case, would be easier to review with using "-D" for format-patch.

And this should be followed by moving common clk series for s5pc100/s5pv210.
See s3c64xx common clk patches in v3.13-next/common-clk-s3c64xx branch as a
reference.

And I have never seen common clk stuff for s5pc100. In addition, I'm not
sure we _still_ need to support s5pc100 in mainline.

Thanks,
- Kukjin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ