linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 12/14] regulator: tps6524x: use devm_regulator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFRkauBTZQzSKgaNg781zsTU4u9V4rYATcWzC=BkJQy07sOBqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Sep 2013 16:06:11 +0800
From:	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
To:	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 12/14] regulator: tps6524x: use devm_regulator_register()

2013/9/26 Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>:
> Use devm_regulator_register() to make cleanup paths simpler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/tps6524x-regulator.c |    7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps6524x-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps6524x-regulator.c
> index 8b9ee39..8fe67fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/tps6524x-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/tps6524x-regulator.c
> @@ -584,10 +584,8 @@ static int pmic_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
>
>         if (!hw)
>                 return 0;
> -       for (i = 0; i < N_REGULATORS; i++) {
> -               regulator_unregister(hw->rdev[i]);
> +       for (i = 0; i < N_REGULATORS; i++)
>                 hw->rdev[i] = NULL;
> -       }
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> @@ -631,7 +629,8 @@ static int pmic_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>                 config.init_data = init_data;
>                 config.driver_data = hw;
>
> -               hw->rdev[i] = regulator_register(&hw->desc[i], &config);
> +               hw->rdev[i] = devm_regulator_register(dev, &hw->desc[i],
> +                                                     &config);
>                 if (IS_ERR(hw->rdev[i])) {
>                         ret = PTR_ERR(hw->rdev[i]);
>                         hw->rdev[i] = NULL;

I think you can simply return PTR_ERR(hw->rdev[i]) if devm_regulator_register()
fails.
You are using devm_regulator_register now, so don't need to call
pmic_remove() in probe() error path.
Then pmic_remove() and .remove = pmic_remove() can be removed as well.

Regards,
Axel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/