lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:58:53 +0100
From:	"David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@...hat.com>,
	"Tejun Heo" <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, "Joerg Roedel" <joro@...tes.org>,
	<x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/6] PCI/MSI: Factor out pci_get_msi_cap() interface

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] PCI/MSI: Factor out pci_get_msi_cap() interface
> 
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 05:00:16PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:58:05PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > > Unfortunately, pSeries is a shows-topper here :( It seems we have to
> > > introduce pci_get_msi{,x}_limit() interfaces to honour the quota
> > > thing.  I just hope the hardware set for pSeries is limited and we
> > > won't need to use it for all drivers.
> >
> > Can you please go into a bit of detail on that?  Why does it matter?
> 
> Because otherwise we will re-introduce a problem described by Michael:
> "We have a small number of MSIs available, limited by hardware &
> firmware, if we don't impose a quota then the first device that probes
> will get most/all of the MSIs and other devices miss out."

Would it be possible to do some kind of 2-stage allocation.
In the first pass the driver would pass a minimum and desired
number of MSI-X interrupts, but not actually be given any.
Interrupts could then be allocated after it is known how many
are required and how many are available.

	David



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ