[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52437AA2.5040907@hurleysoftware.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 20:06:58 -0400
From: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
codonell <codonell@...hat.com>, Eduard Benes <ebenes@...hat.com>,
Karel Srot <ksrot@...hat.com>,
Matt Newsome <mnewsome@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: v3.10 breaks T.tcflush (Was: tty: disassociate_ctty() sends the
extra SIGCONT)
On 09/25/2013 12:21 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Peter, thanks for your explanations about tty_old_pgrp/etc,
> I'll try to reply later. I need to read your email carefully.
Ok.
If you're interested, I highly recommend reading Chapter 34
("Process Groups, Sessions, and Job Control") of Michael Kerrisk's
book, The Linux Programming Interface.
> FYI, LSB tests report another failure starting from 3.10.
>
> See lsb-test-core/lts_vsx-pcts/tset/POSIX.os/devclass/tcflush/tcflush.c
> attached below. test4() fails with
>
> SIGTTOU not received
> tcflush(TCIOFLUSH) action was performed
> when TOSTOP was set
>
> I'll try to investigate, but let me repeat I know absolutely nothing
> about drivers/tty/, termios, etc. Perhaps you can take a look? So far I
> didn't even look into the attached code, I have no idea what it does.
Thanks for the report. I looked into this and found another regression.
Patch coming.
Looks like I'll be integrating LSB into my testbench.
Regards,
Peter Hurley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists