[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130926100511.GJ26785@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:05:11 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Avoid select_idle_sibling() for
wake_affine(.sync=true)
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:58:12AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> @@ -3429,6 +3440,9 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int wake_flags)
> int want_affine = 0;
> int sync = wake_flags & WF_SYNC;
>
> + if (sync)
> + p->se.last_sync_wakeup = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
> +
> if (p->nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
> return prev_cpu;
>
Oh, I suppose something like:
if (sync && !p->se.last_sync_wakeup)
p->se.last_sync_wakeup = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
is also a nice variation to try..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists