[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALkWK0k5neR50h+AWEF5AgnpbgWMitZUnbv_caVzt6HiUA6mXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 16:23:29 +0530
From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org, lethal@...ux-sh.org,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] um: Do not use SUBARCH
Richard Weinberger wrote:
> So, what exactly is broken in upstream?
> make defconfig works as it always did.
Auto-detection of SUBARCH, which can be done with a simple call to
uname -m (the 90% case). The second patch I submitted prevented
spawning xterms unnecessarily, which we discussed was a good move.
> make defconfig ARCH=um SUBARCH=x86 (or SUBARCH=i386) will create a defconfig for 32bit.
> make defconfig ARCH=um SUBARCH=x86_64 one for 64bit.
Yes, that's how I prepared the patch in the first place.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists