[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130926113400.GM21381@console-pimps.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:34:00 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Linn Crosetto <linn@...com>
Cc: matt.fleming@...el.com, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org, yinghai@...nel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] x86: EFI stub support for large memory maps
On Wed, 25 Sep, at 04:45:41PM, Linn Crosetto wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:58:40PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Sep, at 07:59:08PM, Linn Crosetto wrote:
> > > This patch fixes a problem with EFI memory maps larger than 128 entries
> > > when booting using the EFI stub, which results in overflowing e820_map
> > > in boot_params and an eventual halt when checking the map size in
> > > sanitize_e820_map().
> > >
> > > If the number of map entries is greater than what can fit in e820_map,
> > > add the extra entries to the setup_data list using type SETUP_E820_EXT.
> > > These extra entries are then picked up when the setup_data list is
> > > parsed in parse_e820_ext().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Linn Crosetto <linn@...com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes from v2:
> > > * Removed unnecessary optimization in alloc_e820ext() (Matt Fleming)
> > > * Fixed a bug where an incorrect buffer size may be passed to
> > > get_memory_map when jumping to get_map
> > >
> > > arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c | 239 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > > 1 file changed, 167 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
> >
> > Thanks Linn. I applied this to the 'next' branch at,
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mfleming/efi.git
> >
> > but it required a bit of massaging to apply on top of the changes
> > already there. Could you confirm that my changes are OK? I've included
> > the modified commit below.
>
> I have tested the 'next' branch on a system with a large number of entries in
> the memory map and the merge appears to be functionally correct.
Excellent, thank you for verifying.
> With the change in commit ae8e9060, I noticed the memory map is no longer placed
> in memory allocated with low_alloc(). I have not looked into what effect it
> could have, if any.
Correct. I haven't run into any problems on my test machines.
> > + /* Historic? */
> > + boot_params->alt_mem_k = 32 * 1024;
> > +
> > + status = setup_e820(boot_params, e820ext, e820ext_size);
> >
> > return EFI_SUCCESS;
>
> I might add the following to your merge for semantic reasons:
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
> index 04b228d..a7677ba 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
> @@ -730,6 +730,8 @@ get_map:
> boot_params->alt_mem_k = 32 * 1024;
>
> status = setup_e820(boot_params, e820ext, e820ext_size);
> + if (status != EFI_SUCCESS)
> + return status;
>
> return EFI_SUCCESS;
Aha, nice catch! Though if setup_e820() fails we should be jumping to
the 'free_mem_map' label so we don't leak the memory map, like so,
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
index 04b228d..602950b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
@@ -730,8 +730,8 @@ get_map:
boot_params->alt_mem_k = 32 * 1024;
status = setup_e820(boot_params, e820ext, e820ext_size);
-
- return EFI_SUCCESS;
+ if (status == EFI_SUCCESS)
+ return status;
free_mem_map:
efi_call_phys1(sys_table->boottime->free_pool, mem_map);
I've fixed this up and pushed out a new patch.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists