linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/8] um: Create defconfigs for i386 and x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <524422E5.9080203@nod.at>
Date:	Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:04:53 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com>
CC:	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
	geert@...ux-m68k.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org, lethal@...ux-sh.org,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
	Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] um: Create defconfigs for i386 and x86_64

Am 26.09.2013 13:57, schrieb Ramkumar Ramachandra:
> Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> $ file linux
>>> linux: ELF 32-bit LSB  executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV),
>>> dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, not
>>> stripped
>>> $ ./linux ubd0=busybox-rootfs
>>> [...]
>>> Kernel panic - not syncing: No init found.  Try passing init= option
>>> to kernel. See Linux Documentation/init.txt for guidance.
>>
>> I don't know that rootfs but it looks like there is no init.
> 
> Ofcourse there's an init on the busybox-rootfs, and I'm able to boot
> it with an x86_64 Linux. The reason for panic is incorrect: I think
> (although not sure) a 32-bit rootfs userland will work.

A 32Bit UML kernel can run 32Bit users, a 64Bit UML kernel can only
run 64Bit userland. We have no 32Bit compat layer on x86_64.
Patches are welcome.

>>> [1]    25526 abort (core dumped)  linux ubd0=busybox-rootfs
>>>                                                            %
>>>
>>> Rubbish.
>>
>> UML core dumps at panic() by design.
> 
> On a related note, why does it screw up my terminal? I have to `reset`
> to get a nice working terminal.

I really don't know. That is not by design.

>> Seriously, my plan is to get rid of SUBARCH, that's why I did not push your patches
>> upstream and I've send the rid of SUBARCH patch series.
>> It turned out that other archs depend on SUBARCH too therefore some more thinking is needed.
>> Time passed, merge window closed, $dayjob needed some attention...
> 
> Don't let some grand plan stall reasonable patches that fix immediate problems.
> 
>> That said, your "arch/um: make it work with defconfig and x86_64" patch is also not perfect.
>> "make defconfig ARCH=um SUBARCH=x86" will create x86_64 defconfig, which is wrong and breaks existing
>> setups.
> 
> Wrong.
> 
>   $ make defconfig ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386
>   *** Default configuration is based on 'i386_defconfig'
>   #
>   # configuration written to .config
>   #

I wrote "SUBARCH=x86" *not* SUBARCH=i386.

Again, if SUBARCH=x86 works too I'll happily merge it.
But as of now it breaks existing setups.

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/