[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130926122303.GB30225@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:23:03 +0200
From: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, joeyli <jlee@...e.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
opensuse-kernel@...nsuse.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
James Bottomley <james.bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, JKosina@...e.com,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Gary Lin <GLin@...e.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC V4 PATCH 00/15] Signature verification of hibernate snapshot
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 02:21:23PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> > Is not it as simple as storing hash of hibernation image into NVRAM
> > and then verifying the hash matches the value in NVRAM on next
> > startup? No encryption needed.
>
> I think that part of the exercise is to minimize the number of writes to
> the NVRAM. The hash changes with every hibernation, obviously.
The key should, too.
--
Vojtech Pavlik
Director SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists