[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1380199684-20126-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 18:18:03 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To: <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: palmas: do not abort pin configuration for BIAS_DEFAULT
Recent movement of all configurations of pin in the single call of
pin_config_set(), it is aborting configuration if BIAS_PULL_PIN_DEFAULT
is selected as return of configuration.
The original idea was to just avoid any update on register for pull up/down
configuration if this option is selected.
Fixing this by just bypassing any register update for BIAS_PULL_PIN_DEFAULT
and continuing the remaining configuration.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-palmas.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-palmas.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-palmas.c
index 82638fa..30c4d35 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-palmas.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-palmas.c
@@ -891,9 +891,10 @@ static int palmas_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
param = pinconf_to_config_param(configs[i]);
param_val = pinconf_to_config_argument(configs[i]);
+ if (param == PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_PIN_DEFAULT)
+ continue;
+
switch (param) {
- case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_PIN_DEFAULT:
- return 0;
case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE:
case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
--
1.7.1.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists