lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 29 Sep 2010 19:27:12 -0500
From:	<suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
To:	<herrmann.der.user@...glemail.com>
CC:	<bp@...en8.de>, <jacob.w.shin@...il.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
Subject: [PATCH V2] x86, microcode, AMD: Fix patch level reporting for family15h

From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>

On AMD family15h, applying microcode patch on the a core (core0)
would also affect the other core (core1) in the same compute unit.
The driver would skip applying the patch on core1, but it still
need to update kernel structures to reflect the proper patch level.

The current logic is not updating the struct ucode_cpu_info.cpu_sig.rev
of the skipped core. This causes the /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/microcode/version
to report incorrect patch level as shown below:

$ grep . cpu?/microcode/version
cpu0/microcode/version:0x600063d
cpu1/microcode/version:0x6000626
cpu2/microcode/version:0x600063d
cpu3/microcode/version:0x6000626
cpu4/microcode/version:0x600063d

Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
---
Changes from V1:
	- Update commit log as suggested by Boris.

 arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
index 7123b5d..af99f71 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
@@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu)
 	/* need to apply patch? */
 	if (rev >= mc_amd->hdr.patch_id) {
 		c->microcode = rev;
+		uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-- 
1.8.1.2


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ