[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C2D7FE5348E1B147BCA15975FBA2307514EAAE@IN01WEMBXA.internal.synopsys.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 04:58:27 +0000
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
"Max Filippov" <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/21] of: remove HAVE_ARCH_DEVTREE_FIXUPS
On 09/27/2013 12:21 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
>
> HAVE_ARCH_DEVTREE_FIXUPS appears to always be needed except for sparc,
> but it is only used for /proc/device-teee and sparc does not enable
> /proc/device-tree. So this option is redundant. Remove the option and
> always enable it. This has the side effect of fixing /proc/device-tree
> on arches such as arm64 which failed to define this option.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
Thx for the continued cleanup.
-Vineet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists