linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Use per-file CFLAGS in Makefile

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 27 Sep 2013 09:38:32 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Use per-file CFLAGS in Makefile

Hi Arnaldo,

On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:08:42 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 05:09:21PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> I don't know.  I just thought there's not much thing we can do for those
>> files other than shutting up all warnings.
>  
>> But if you think that's not the right thing, I'll keep the existing
>> options.  What do you think, Arnaldo?
>
> I think keeping the existing options is the right thing to do, if some
> of that can be simplified or made like you did it in your patch, then
> that is the matter for a separate patch, with proper explanation.

Okay, I'll just keep them and resend v2.

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/