[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <524530A4.9060300@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:15:48 +0300
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
To: John Tapsell <johnflux@...il.com>
CC: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
<linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fbcon: fix deadlock in fbcon_generic_blank()
Hi,
On 18/09/13 01:29, John Tapsell wrote:
> Do not lock fb_info when calling sending the FB_EVENT_CONBLANK
> event.
>
> In fbmem.c, the semantics are that we acquire the lock_fb_info first,
> and then console_lock. However when fbcon.c fbcon_generic_blank() is
> called, the console lock could already be held. Locking fb_info can
> thus cause a deadlock.
So has this happened for you? Or is it just theoretical?
> fbmem.c sends the FB_EVENT_BLANK without locking lock_fb_info first, so
> this change introduces similar behaviour.
I don't think this is true. FB_EVENT_BLANK is sent in fb_blank(). That
one is called when FBIOBLANK ioctl is called, and it does lock_fb_info().
I'm not familiar with the console code, but removing a lock makes me
feel rather uneasy... But looking at the code, I can also see that
console_lock could already be held, so something here definitely looks
broken.
The only place using FB_EVENT_CONBLANK seems to be backlight, and if I'm
not mistaken, it has its own lock, and doesn't depend on the fb_info
being locked.
Tomi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (902 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists