linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c-designware: define i2c_dw_pci_runtime

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130927082259.GC28875@intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:22:59 +0300
From:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:	Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@...oste.net>,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-designware: define i2c_dw_pci_runtime_idle only with
 runtime pm

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 04:43:13AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:24:03AM +0200, Vincent Stehlé wrote:
> > Make sure i2c_dw_pci_runtime_idle() is defined only when actually used, when
> > CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is defined.
> > 
> > This fixes the following compilation warning:
> > 
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c:188:12: warning: ‘i2c_dw_pci_runtime_idle’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@...oste.net>
> > Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
> 
> I wonder if this fix is complete? Mika?
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c
> > index f6ed06c..2b5d3a6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c
> > @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ static int i2c_dw_pci_resume(struct device *dev)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME
> >  static int i2c_dw_pci_runtime_idle(struct device *dev)
> >  {
> >  	int err = pm_schedule_suspend(dev, 500);
> > @@ -194,6 +195,7 @@ static int i2c_dw_pci_runtime_idle(struct device *dev)
> >  		return 0;
> >  	return -EBUSY;
> >  }
> > +#endif
> >  
> >  static const struct dev_pm_ops i2c_dw_pm_ops = {
> 
> Shouldn't this be using UNIVERSAL_DEV_PM_OPS with the suspend and resume
> function #ifdeffed by CONFIG_PM_SLEEP?

Yes, I think that would be better.

> 
> >  	.resume         = i2c_dw_pci_resume,
> > -- 
> > 1.8.4.rc3
> > 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/