[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130927103802.GA4422@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 12:38:02 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
huawei.libin@...wei.com, wangyijing@...wei.com,
fenghua.yu@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de, guohanjun@...wei.com,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/smpboot: Fix announce_cpu() to printk() the
last "OK" properly
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 08:51:15AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
<snip stuff to do>
> (and I hope you learned the lesson about sending improvement patches
> against long-bitrotten code, as the new x86 CPU bootup printout format
> code maintainer!)
Oh shit, what did I get into!? I only wanted to do a quick fix and get
back to the real, manly bugs!
:-) :-) :-)
Ok, I'll do all that you suggested and send you the results.
Btw, qemu is so cool in generating the craziest topologies and much
easier than me actually going and looking for such a real big system:
kvm -smp 64 \
-numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-7 \
-numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=8-15 \
-numa node,nodeid=2,cpus=16-23 \
-numa node,nodeid=3,cpus=24-31 \
-numa node,nodeid=4,cpus=32-39 \
-numa node,nodeid=5,cpus=40-47 \
-numa node,nodeid=6,cpus=48-55 \
-numa node,nodeid=7,cpus=56-63 ...
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists