linux-kernel - Re: [RFT PATCH v1 0/7] enable FPSIMD lazy save and restore for arm64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130927105045.GA11063@MacBook-Pro.local>
Date:	Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:50:46 +0100
From:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:	Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
Cc:	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v1 0/7] enable FPSIMD lazy save and restore for arm64

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 09:04:40AM +0100, Jiang Liu wrote:
> From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
> 
> This patchset enables FPSIMD lazy save and restore for ARM64, you could
> apply it against v3.12-rc2.
> 
> We have done basic functional tests on ARM fast model, but still lack
> of detail performance benchmark on real hardware platforms. We would
> appreciate if you could help to test it on really hardware platforms!

That's my issue as well, I would like to see some benchmarks before
merging such patches.

-- 
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/