lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbhywp7_wAhOSzdMe==YoCo0mAcy1mJrdW3bURKWLxQeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 27 Sep 2013 14:06:54 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
Cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] New descriptor-based GPIO interface

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com> wrote:

> Here is a proper patch series for the descriptor-based GPIO interface to be
> merged into -next. It is rebased on your for-next branch and only slightly
> changed with respect to the RFC I posted earlier, only more thoroughly tested.
> The documentation part is missing because I need some more time to rework it
> (I'm on holidays this week but wanted to get the code into -next before 28th),
> and anyway at this point I just want to make sure that the extra refactoring
> does not break any existing code.
>
> My hope is to get this into -next before the 28th so this patchset can be
> effectively tested, even if the new interfaces are not used yet. Since the old
> integer-based interface now relies on top of gpiod_, this should provide good
> coverage for both.

I've applied it now, but no idea whether it will hit the last -next tree in
time, hopefully at the very last second ...

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ