[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52458876.4070205@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 19:00:30 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC: "linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: palmas: do not abort pin configuration for
BIAS_DEFAULT
On Thursday 26 September 2013 09:08 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/26/2013 06:48 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> Recent movement of all configurations of pin in the single call of
>> pin_config_set(), it is aborting configuration if BIAS_PULL_PIN_DEFAULT
>> is selected as return of configuration.
>>
>> The original idea was to just avoid any update on register for pull up/down
>> configuration if this option is selected.
> That doesn't sound correct. If a config option is specified in DT or the
> mapping table, it should be applied to HW. If someone doesn't want a
> particular config option applied, then it simply shouldn't be mentioned
> in DT or the mapping table.
>
> IIUC, BIAS_DEFAULT should be used only on HW where there is a concept of
> a true default bias, and in that case, that is what should be applied.
>
Hmm.. When I added the PIN_DEFAULT, I just though that do not update
anything in the register and implemented like that.
There is nothing "default" option in HW.
In this patch, I just fixed the broken stuff due to recent change.
However, it the PIN_DEFAULT is not valid option then I need to remove it
from driver as well as from dt document of Palmas.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists